top of page
  • TikTok
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Spotify
< Back
< Back

Riley v California

Roll Call Briefing Message – Cell Phone Searches After Arrest


Summary of Riley v. California (2014)

Riley v. California is the Supreme Court case that says you generally cannot search an arrestee’s cell phone without a warrant. In practice, if you seize a phone during an arrest, you must secure it and wait for a search warrant before examining its data – unless a true emergency (exigent circumstances) demands an immediate search.


Tips for Sergeants (Guiding the Conversation)

  • Emphasize the Rule: Remind officers that while they can seize and secure a suspect’s phone for evidence, they cannot scroll through its contents without a warrant. Point out that cell phones hold vast personal data, so they’re treated differently than, say, a wallet or backpack during a search.


  • Discuss Exceptions Sparingly: Lead a discussion on what counts as exigent circumstances. For example, ask the team to think of a scenario like a kidnapped child’s life at risk where a phone might have to be searched right away. Highlight that these situations are very rare – in day-to-day policing, there’s almost always time to get a warrant.


  • Reinforce Best Practices: Advise officers on how to handle phones post-arrest: turn the device off or use airplane mode to prevent remote data wiping while waiting for a warrant. Make sure they know that any

    evidence found unlawfully (without a warrant or a real emergency) could be thrown out in court.


Key Questions to Ask Officers

  • You arrest someone and seize their phone. Can you search it right away, or what should you do first?


  • What kind of situation would allow you to search a phone without a warrant? Can you think of a real emergency example?


  • How can you protect the phone’s data while waiting for a warrant? (E.g. preventing remote wipe.)


Reminder: Articulate Exigent Circumstances in Reports

If an officer ever searches a phone without a warrant due to an emergency, they must clearly document the exigent circumstances in the report. Supervisors should remind the team: spell out exactly what the urgent situation was, and why you couldn’t wait for a warrant. Thorough documentation of any emergency is crucial to justify the action and keep the evidence admissible in court.






bottom of page